« thoughts on the new rode videomic hd | Main | a filmmaker's pre-shoot checklist »

Comments

Rob Webster

My thought is, it's neat technology, but won't be used much. People thought the Segway would cause us to re-design city planning. It didn't. The Lytro is pretty cool in that it lets you decide a focal point later. But it's really not that hard to shoot a picture with the focal point I want now. Ultimately, at some point, an aesthetic decision has to be made. Whether that's before or after the picture is taken doesn't seem that earth-shaking. Who would benefit most from this? Maybe photojournalists, shooting away in a chaotic situation without the luxury of framing and focusing a shot. Or people who are just bad photographers. But cameras are so good already, even in full-auto mode, at guessing what you'd want in focus, that I see this technology having limited broad application. (But watch me eat my words in 5 years when it's included in every camera.)

Alex Schwindt

Yeah, the two biggest immediate uses I could see would be more in the filmmaking world. For instance it woul be great to be able to correct inaccurate focus pulled when shooting documnentary work with a small viewfinder. I would also be great to pull perfect rack focuses after the shoot.

But of course, this technology is still a long way off from being applied the filmmaking world. At least I think it is...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment